During the summer of 2000, Professor John Tarduno, Post-Doctoral
Researcher Rory Cottrell and five students conducted geological studies
on Axel Heiberg and Ellesmere Islands. This expedition, the
forth of its kind from the University of Rochester, involved collecting
rock and fossil samples for analysis in the Paleomagnetic Laboratory of
the University of Rochester (New York, USA). We hope
to use these samples to understand the processes that caused climate change
in the Arctic region between 200 and 65 million years ago.
Our field work lasted approximately one month (July 2000).
Our main focus was the collection of samples for "paleomagnetic" analysis.
The direction of the ancient Earth's magnetic field is recorded in a rock
when it forms. We can measure this ancient direction using
highly sensitive magnetometers, such as those at the University of Rochester.
In the past, the poles of the Earth's magnetic field have flipped, or reversed,
at infrequent intervals. Therefore, if a rock formed when the magnetic
field was reversed, the ancient direction we measure in it today will point
toward the South pole. We can use this characteristic (whether
the ancient magnetic direction points to the North or South pole) to determine
the age of a rock.
To obtain samples for "paleomagnetic" analysis, we drill small one inch
cores into the bedrock using portable drills. Next, the present-day
orientation of a sample is recorded using a "Sun compass" (which tells
us the direction of the sun at a given time relative to the sample).
These measurements allow us to relate any further magnetic analyses done
on the rock to the rock's original orientation in the Arctic.
We must use a sun compass instead of a conventional magnetic compass because
our field area is very close to the present magnetic north pole, and, as
a result, there are drastic fluctuations in the daily magnetic field in
this area.
Rock samples were collected in the Blackwelder Mountains (Camp II) and
near the south shore of Audhild Bay (Camp III), both on Ellesmere Island.
At each locality, we hope the sequence of magnetic directions will allow
us to determine precisely the age of the rocks. Preliminary
laboratory results confirm that these rocks to carry a characteristic remanent
magnetization needed for dating purposes. The rocks from which
these samples were taken are important because they indicate that in the
past (about 135 million years ago) the climate in the Arctic changed from
being very warm to relatively cold. Climate changes can be
preserved in rocks in several ways that can be read by geologists.
One way is in the type of fossils rocks contain. For example,
we have previously discovered fossil reptiles in Arctic rocks that suggest
extremely warm past climates (Camp I: Expedition Fiord). Another
way is in the type of "sedimentary" structures that make up the rock.
Some of structures in the rocks we collected in 2000 indicate cool conditions,
where freezing would have been common. We would ultimately like to know
why and how the Earth changed between these "warm" and "cool" states.
The first step in this work, however, is to determine the precise age
of the rocks. With this age information, we can compare the
Arctic rocks with rocks formed at the same time at different places on
the Earth. This comparison allows us to learn what the climate
was like elsewhere on the Earth when the climate was changing in the Arctic
region and can help us determine whether or not the Arctic climate change
is a global or regional event. These comparisons can help us
identify the processes that caused the climate to change (for example,
changes in carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere or changes in oceanic
currents that distribute heat throughout the planet.)
At the same time that we are analyzing the magnetic directions preserved
in the rocks, we are also investigating the magnetic mineral grains they
contain. Magnetic directions are recorded by tiny iron-rich
minerals (known as magnetite grains) that are either present when or form
while a rock forms. Unfortunately, sometimes other iron-bearing
minerals can form much later than the original formation of the rock.
These minerals (hematite, for example), can record a "false" magnetization,
which differs greatly from the "primary" magnetic signal that is useful
for determining a rock's true age. Therefore, we also spend
a considerable amount of time determining the type of magnetic minerals
that are in a given rock sample. This is done through visual
analysis using high-powered microscopes, and with magnetic tests, since
different magnetic minerals have different magnetic properties.
At present, our paleomagnetic laboratory analysis is in its beginning
stages. We know that some of the rocks we collected in 2000 do preserve
a magnetic signal which will be useful for determining the rock age.
We have been able measure the weak signals using our laboratory magnetometers,
and to further analyze the magnetic directions using computer workstations.
These data will be used to guide the future sampling that will be needed
to complete our study.
Emily Brandon, Campus Times Staff February 8,
2001
While many college students were getting a tan last summer, Professor
of Earth and Environmental Sciences John Tarduno and his students were
trekking through the snow of the Arctic region in the name of science.
This was the fourth in a series of expeditions to the high Canadian Arctic
to collect geological samples and chart the unexplored wilderness in order
to better understand the geological history of North America.
The trip, from July 4 to August 3, focused on studying the volcanic,
tectonic and paleoclimatic evolution of the Arctic region from about 140
to 80 million years ago. ìWe believe volcanism and tectonics,
the motion of the Earthís plates and mountain building events, are intimately
related to Earthís climate,î said Tarduno, who is also chair of the department.
Support from the National Science Foundation and the National Geographic
Society allowed the undergraduates to take part in the expedition.
They participated in scientific collection and learned basic field techniques.
This year, Take-5 Scholar Matt Polizzatto, junior Matt Friedman, and sophomores
Santo Marciano and Allyson OíKane journeyed to the Arctic along with teaching
assistant Peter Lippert and postdoctoral fellow Rory Cottrell.
ìThis expedition gave me the chance to learn some of the basics of field
geology, something that will likely come in very handy in the future,î
Friedman said. ìAlso, I enjoyed just being there and living
for nearly a month out of a tent in the Arctic.î
Because of the gradient between the equator and the poles of the earth,
the Arctic is an ideal place to study paleoclimateó it is extremely sensitive
to global change. The researchers found evidence that the Arctic
was not always the temperature that it is today. At one location
they found vertebrate fossils of dinosaurs and turtles, which suggest that
the Arctic once had a climate similar to that of Florida today.
But in other rocks they found ice accumulation in mountainous regions,
suggesting that the Arctic used to be much colder than it is now.
The weather was exceptionally good on this trip compared to past years,
which allowed them to establish camps at much higher latitudes, going as
far as 81.5 degrees north on Ellesmere Island. Normally, this
area is shrouded in fog or snow, which does not allow people to camp and
work there or see sights such as Axel Heiberg Island, Nansen Sound and
the Arctic Ocean sea ice beyond.
Tarduno and his team found a series of ammonites that will help them
to determine the age of some of the rock formations. They also
found a series of lava flows at their highest latitude camp.
This lava has the potential to help them unravel the processes responsible
for the anomalous rates of volcanic activity seen in the Arctic.
ìThe Arctic is a key area for understanding past climate change,î Tarduno
said. ìThis, together with the realization that you are working
in an area where few or perhaps no people have visited previously, brings
excitement to the research.î
Lippert agrees. ìWhen I thought about the Arctic, I thought
of hundreds of miles of snow and ice and bitter cold temperatures,î he
said after his second trip to the Arctic. ìThere was plenty
of snow and it got very cold at times, but I discovered that the Arctic
is a beautiful landscape of rugged mountains, glaciers and tundra.î
Lippert said he would jump at the chance to go to the Arctic again,
but advises that it is not for everyone: ìAn expedition thousands
of miles from any real form of civilization is rigorous, the hours are
long and hard and the weather can make or break it. But if
this sounds like it appeals to you, definitely try to do such a thing.î